The Forgotten Group Member Essay Example for Free

The Forgotten Group element EssayThe case study of The Forgotten Group Member demonstrations in what manner squads separate imput able to an absence of communication. The case verifies that knowing how to lead a root is just as significant as being a part of the team. It is imperative to understand that not only if does a leader exhaust the responsibility to lead the team just the members use up a responsibility to partake in revise for the team effectively carry go forth an assignment.Part I Group DevelopmentTeams pass through legion(predicate) gunpoints for example the forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning stages. This particular case places the team within the storming stage. When ag convocation participants get to know from each one other better, the storming stage begins. This stage is considered as a bid for power. Each group member is wonder whether or not he or she will be respected and this may play place in competition, tension and maybe disagreement. Relationships render strained and differences become uncomfortable. Christine is challenged for control by mike. The hostility microphone feels developed when he came upon his teammates during an unofficial group merging. Left unaddressed, as in this case, I can only assume that Mike become angry, hostile, and now unproductive.As the leader, Christines main task at this stage is to coach group members, in particular Mike, to get them on board. She needs to emphasis that teams come in concert because they share a common interest, and that members are treated equally. Once Christine re-evaluates the work and re-introduces the forming stages she can help re-integrate Mike back into the group. The forming stage occurs when the leader directs the team and establishes objectives clearly. Once Mike is reintroduced to the team goals and realizes his role on the team hopefully he would accept made positive contributions in an effort to produce a high-quality group output.P art II Problem IdentificationThe hostile attitude Christina and her teammates have sexd by Mike occurred during an unforeseen team gathering however Mike should reevaluate his overall performance in a group setting thus far. Based off his action, not attending team meetings and providing brief notes, Mike has become the social loafer of the team. companionable loafers can be described as team members who work little and put less effort into the team assignment, than he or she would do if he or she had to complete the assignment alone. The key produces facing Christine is not only Mikes social loafing but the lack of communication on her behalf to inform Mike of his lack of participation.By understanding the stages of group development, Christine should tolerate redefined her team roles so that social loafers are more visible and peer pressures are more likely. This in turn will lead to yet another theory concept known as Social facilitation. Social facilitation occurs when the air of team participants are influenced positively by the presence of others in a team. tally to our text, Social facilitation theory suggests that working in the presence of others creates an emotional arousal or excitement that stimulates behavior and on that pointfore affects performance. When Christine recognized Mike as the clown of the group she should have relied on his strengths to embrace the audience. maybe assigning him the task of presenting the power point slides for their team presentation.Part III Retrospective EvaluationSince this a difficult situation to solve and each solution has pros and cons I can only reiterate solutions maintain in the previous sections. The ideal solution would have been for the group leader, Christine, to re-evaluate her understanding of group development. Once she had a full understanding of the stages and process that it takes to have an efficient team she would have known how to properly cross the situation. When I mention properly handle the situation, I refer to the fact that she should have addressed the issue with Mike in a non-threatening environment. After communicating with Mike, Christina would have been aware of any essential skills that he is lacking or uncomfortable situations that are preventing quality work.At this point in time Christine could have re-evaluated the work and reintroduced the forming stages. Mike will once again be re-introduced to the team goals and realize his role on the team. A different solution, not mentioned previously, would be Distributed Leadership. As per the course text, distributed leadership is the sharing of responsibility for meeting group task and maintenance needs. This involves having the leader, Christine, initiate discussions, clarifying issues, and sharing information while involving other team players. As outlined in the case, many team members were functioning fine, Mike was having trouble being able to meet deadlines and rarely let everyone know. This sign als once again a communication problem.By having Christine reach out to Mike and his fellow team members, any issues that were apparent would be brought up and handled. In this case, Mike would have told Christine about his demanding job and relationship woes and thus the team could have adjusted according. The only demise of this system is that the discussions and information sharing will not always be as effective as genuinely addressing the issues head on.Part IV ReflectionLooking back at this case and the events that have transpired up till this point, it is obvious that Christine was not an effective group leader. Although the majority of the team did work efficiently there was just one negative aspect. That negative aspect was Mike. Being able to deal with conflict comes from experience but in this situation Christine was voted by her team members to be the group leader which should have shake confidence in her. This confidence should have helped her address Mike in the beg inning. If Christine have had the knowledge and the skills of group development she would have been able to effectively provide leadership.